Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[To Main] Feature - DESENG-667: Add engagement configuration summary #2577

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

NatSquared
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #: https://citz-gdx.atlassian.net/browse/DESENG-667

Description of changes:

  • Feature Add engagement configuration summary 🎟️ DESENG-667

    • Added a tabbed layout to the new engagement view page
    • Added a new "Configuration" tab to display the engagement's configuration details
      • The other tabs are blank for now, but will be filled in future tickets
    • The configuration tab allows navigating back to the engagement configuration page
    • Improvements to how engagements and related resources are fetched and saved

User Guide update ticket (if applicable):

@NatSquared NatSquared changed the title [To Main] Feature: [To Main] Feature - DESENG-667: Add engagement configuration summary Aug 16, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.04%. Comparing base (ee6caab) to head (993d964).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2577   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.04%   76.04%           
=======================================
  Files         609      609           
  Lines       22080    22083    +3     
  Branches     1785     1785           
=======================================
+ Hits        16790    16793    +3     
  Misses       5026     5026           
  Partials      264      264           
Flag Coverage Δ
metweb 65.03% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
...eb/src/components/common/Indicators/StatusChip.tsx 76.92% <100.00%> (+3.01%) ⬆️
met-web/src/styles/Theme.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)

@Baelx
Copy link
Collaborator

Baelx commented Aug 16, 2024

image 😂These are funny but please continue to write descriptive commit messages and include the ticket number in each one

Copy link
Collaborator

@Baelx Baelx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this quick work Nat! Could you please just review that screen reader users will have an okay time with the tooltip button for copying the URL? Ideally they'd get all the same feedback as sighted users but if not we can just make sure the button instructions are good.

Also, maybe it'd be a good idea for us all to start communicating more about adding net-new components and changing app infrastructure. I'm trying to be mindful of managing complexity with this app. Could you maybe see if you could synthesize ConfigWizard and CreationWizard? I won't be insistent on it since you know the code best but we need to try to be economical whenever we can.

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
import React, { Suspense } from 'react';
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There looks to be a lot of very similar code to that in CreationWizard. Was there a reason we needed to create a net-new component for this? I see that you made it a Modal - does it need to be one or could we have just sent folks back to the CreationWizard?

met-web/src/routes/AuthenticatedRoutes.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 19, 2024

@NatSquared NatSquared merged commit e2d09dd into main Aug 19, 2024
8 checks passed
@NatSquared NatSquared deleted the feature/DESENG-667-admin-authoring-summary-section branch August 19, 2024 18:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants